since the beginning of the scientific revolution, the publication of information – insights, knowledge, theories, etc. – was one of the main driving forces of science. it can be argued that the scientific revolution was fuelled by a rebellion of newton’s contemporaries against secrecy and private profiteering as much as a different way of thinking.
for centuries, the format of the printed scientific article has been refined into a number of different standardised layouts (dependent eg. on the branch of science, or the publishing medium) and conventions (eg. for citations, or for the order of authors. then, the internet came along and, over night, made that all obsolete — only that it didn’t. scientific publishing is still defined by the format of the printed paper, creating a number of problems in the digital.
it is time to rethink scientific publishing formats.
in a digital-first publication format, references could not only refer to other work, they could refer to the very sentences and words of a quoted article; the multitude of reading devices, from smart phones to 4k screens and beyond, deserve optimised presentations of text and images depending on the strengths of each screen; printed versions could flow into the various standard paper sizes; and since scientific work often gets refined, revised, and discussed, we could even think about ways to reflect this in a new format.
the goal of this diploma thesis (and beyond?) is to define a new standard digital-first scientific publication format, based on the affordances and strength of digital media on one hand, and on the needs and ideas of scientific writers. previous attempts to do this should be documented. also, a renderer for LaTeX (or similar) should be implemented that translates written work into this new format.